Sunday, June 29, 2008

Cowardice and Human Essentials

A couple of friends and I spent the night in the Devil's Tramping Ground recently, and aside from the fact that nothing strange at all happened (even though we were actually within the circle itself the whole night), it was a very enjoyable time. However, something struck me about the whole experience.

When we arrived at the site, we were surprised (and somewhat disheartened) to find that there were two cars already parked on the side of the road! We parked, entered, and found a small group of 18-26 year olds checking out the are. They were supposed paranormal investigators. They claimed to have photographic evidence of high spiritual activity within the circle, and also claimed to have been physically affected by spiritual forces (a push, a scratch, etc.). I made it clear to this group that I did not believe in the legend (or any of their supposed paranormal activity) and was simply there to disprove it. After some fairly civil conversation (and watching them try to contact spirits), they went on their way. I was told something very interesting, however, before they left.

I had made a comment that I do not remember, but it was simply another expression of my disbelief. I realized that it might have sounded more mocking than I had intended, so I apologized for the tone of my statement, and then simply told them again that I did not mean to mock them, I just did not believe as they did. The leader of the group told me that was fine, and then that "Disbelief and skepticism are simply signs of cowardice." I did not know how to respond to this statement immediately, so I just shrugged and expressed my apathy towards his claim, promptly disregarding it, not fully understanding what he meant. This morning, I think I began to realize what he could have intended, and then I realized that if his logic is correct, there exists not a man who isn't a coward.

I think what was meant by his statement was that I was refusing to believe in something because I was afraid of it, and instead of facing my fear, I escaped it by not allowing myself to believe it, thus, I was being a coward. I think a good example of this logic is when someone I knew found out I did not believe in Hell. This person believed that I must be going to Hell because I didn't believe in it. This was the logic: I knew I was going to Hell and that terrified me, so I decided to dismiss the idea of it so I could live my life without changing. The cowardice I was being accused of was that I dismissed anything that frightened me so I would not have to deal with it. Allow me to ponder that for a moment.

What would frighten me about the spiritual activeness of legendary locations? What would it do to me if I had a paranormal experience? I suppose that may frighten me because it would be something that didn't fit into the way I saw the world. I would not be able to explain a ghost in my worldview. I have little room for hauntings and angry spirits in the way I see things, and to experience a specter would shake the foundations of my beliefs. The idea that spiritual forces really are active and manifest in the world just doesn't fly with me. I do not deny that spiritual forces exist, but I do deny that they care enough about spooking superstitious people for the fun of it.

Shaking the way people see things. That really is the only fear that I think people have. I do not mean fear as phobias; I do not count fear of spiders or heights true fear, I consider those severe emotional drives of disgust and anxiety. I think that true fear is the unraveling of the way things are for a person. I think that everybody "knows" how the world works, and they will rationalize it to stay the way it is. Therefore allowing myself to believe in these "superstitions" as I call them would unravel my worldview, and I would thus be afraid.

My answer, however, as I have already stated, is that everybody has this fear. The man that implied I was a coward had his own worldview which probably didn't allow for these superstitions not to be true. If this man had devoted his free time to studying paranormal phenomena (as he had expressed to us that he had) then what would it mean for him to find out that he was completely wrong? He would be afraid. I cannot blame him. I would never call him a coward for it either. I would simply say that he has the same fear as all of humanity. Take a look at the man of deep faith who has devoted his entire life to the worship of the Christian Trinitarian god of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. What would happen if that man found out that there really is no god at all, and all of his life's faith was in vain? He would be afraid. And what would happen to the lifelong atheist who spend his life debating and arguing that there is not god or eternal life? If he found out he was wrong he would probably be afraid for his soul.


What I am saying here is that every man is a coward if I am correct in stating that the only fear humanity has is that one's worldview is wrong, and that cowardice is hiding from fear. I believe this is essential. What would man be if he did not fear the error of his worldview? He would have no follow-through. He would be principally flimsy. He would believe nothing. If I had no reason not to do something, I would probably do it. If a man had no fear of changing his worldview, I would question the validity of his humanity. There is not one human being I have met that didn't believe the world to be a certain way. Certainly, there are many (myself included) that do not know or understand every part of the universe, but they do believe in a system (worldview) that everything is based on. There is no one that believes nothing. Believing is a human essential. Understanding is not. I claim much understanding, but I claim stronger subjectivity.

I conclude in saying that I do not believe that either skepticism or faith arises from cowardice, but that they arise from being human. It is only when they run against experience that I believe they become scapegoats from reality. It is probably commonly thought that I have fallen far away from faith in the theology I grew up with, but I believe that if I had held to it when my life's experience has pointed in another direction, only then would I really be a coward.

7 comments:

koinonia said...

I thought about whether I was afraid of changing my worldview when I first read this blog, and I at first thought "No, I'm not". I like to be proven wrong, it helps me grow, I derive much joy in life from trying to figure it out, and the more times I can start over, the more things I can consider to be true or not. However, I realized I do have one belief that I am too afraid to let go of, and that is the belief that there is such thing as universal morals, yet that is also what my worldview disagrees with. I don't believe there to be a universal answer for things, I'm more inclined to post-modernism. However, when it comes to human rights I'm a different person. I cannot shake the belief that ALL men deserve to be treated fairly, but I also have begun to realize that is a bit idealistic. I guess I am afraid that man may not have certain rights, I mean these "rights" are still a fairly new concept.
I figure you write long blogs, so I'll write long comments to match.

Rayman said...

There is a difference between being proven wrong and the idea that I am trying to express. Think about it this way. How can you be proven wrong? When it comes to theology and philosophy, you can't really be PROVEN wrong. You can only be convinced of things by following logical steps to reach conclusions. I would say that you are relying on logic then, and that is your system. It's not that I would say that you are afraid of changing your opinions on things, I would say that your basic assumption of interpretation is that of reason and logic, and if THAT were overturned somehow, you would be afraid of the outcome. There aren't many things reason and logic can't explain, and that is what I am saying here. They explain things so they FIT IN THE SYSTEM.

Unknown said...

I'm not so sure a belief in one thing is cowardice toward another. Perhaps blind judgment and a failure to accept ones own conclusions may not be completely infallible, but to tag it with a frivolous emotion like cowardice is like saying that Life is love.
In this realm of possibility, saying that something does not exist; holding to that disbelief would not be a cowardice. For one, you don't believe in it. Not believing in it would therefore imply that you are afraid of nothing which in turn is just silly. However, if some part of you is afraid then you in fact do believe, at least in some small way, that it does exist or could potentially exist, ergo you are being a coward by denying it. Such is the twisted logic of faith.
I'm thinking that in the example provided, you truly don't believe in the paranormal excursions of the devil's circle and are thus convinced there is nothing to be afraid, as you should be.
As for Hell, I hold to the fact that such a damnable place could in fact exist, but reserve no idea of being afraid of it. If I can't prove that it can or can't exist, I hold that it could potentially exist and thus keep it open to speculation. There could be extrasensory forces at work in the Devil's Circle and until I go there and prove either way, I shall be content on not fearing it nor denying it.
But cowardice? Only if you did believe and were in denial.

Anonymous said...

Yes if the truth be known, in some moments I can say that I approve of with you, but you may be in the light of other options.
to the article there is stationary a without question as you did in the fall publication of this solicitation www.google.com/ie?as_q=power retouche pro 7.3 ?
I noticed the catch-phrase you suffer with not used. Or you functioning the pitch-dark methods of promotion of the resource. I have a week and do necheg

Anonymous said...

hi dudes. I'm honestly into shoes and I have been looking allowing for regarding that particular brand. The prices seeking the velcros were approximately 210 dollars everwhere. But for all I base this locate selling them for the benefit of half price. I in reality like these [url=http://www.shoesempire.com]prada sneakers[/url]. I will definetly order those. what can you say about it?

Anonymous said...

good evening dudes. I'm honestly into shoes and I had been searching allowing for regarding that meticulous model. The prices for the sneakers are around 210 dollars on every page. But for all I base this locate selling them as a remedy for half price. I really like these [url=http://www.shoesempire.com]gucci sneakers[/url]. I will absolutely buy these. what can you tell me about these?

Anonymous said...

Hi everyone

I'm new to this forum.. Hope to have nice time around here...

Look forward to 'meeting' you all, Dennis from [url=http://www.myonlinepayday.com]Payday Loans[/url] website!